מערכת COL
|
יום ז' טבת ה׳תשס״ד
01.01.2004
הרב פנחס פלדמן חגג "דידן נצח" בלוס-אנג'לס
בשבוע לפני שעדת חסידי חב"ד ומקורביהם פתחו בחגיגות "דידן נצח" של הספרים בה' טבת, ציין השליח הראשי של סידני, הרב פנחס פלדמן את נס החנוכה וה"דידן נצח" הפרטי שלו ושל קהילתו האוסטרלית. בחסדי שמים, המשבר הכלכלי במוסדות חב"ד הגיע לסיומו בעזרת משפיעו האישי, הרב שלמה קונין, השליח הראשי לקליפורניה. השבוע, הרב פלדמן הגיע לומר לו תודה.
במהלך ביקורו בלוס-אנג'לס, הרב פלדמן התוועד בישיבת "אור אלחנן חב"ד" לרגל ה' טבת, עם הרב קונין, ראש הישיבה הרב עזרא שוחט ו-130 התלמידים וקבוצה מאנ"ש בעיר. במהלך ההתוועדות, האורח שמשמש כרב קהילת חב"ד וראש ישיבת חב"ד בסידני, שיתף את הקהל בסיפורים אישיים שהתרחשו במהלך שנות שליחותו.
הרב פנחס פלדמן (משמאל) והרב עזרא שוחט בהתוועדות ה' טבת * צילום: שמואל רוגדצקי
לכתבה זו התפרסמו 5 תגובות - לקריאת כל התגובות
הוסף תגובה
5 תגובות
1.
האם אכן נצח?
ז' טבת ה׳תשס״ד
כמדומני שהרב פלדמן הפסיד בתביעתו נגד גיסו - וא"כ מאי נצח?
תגובה חדשה
הגב לתגובה
0
0
2.
ניצחון של הקהילה
ז' טבת ה׳תשס״ד
תגובה ל1
זה ממש לא חשוב אם הוא הפסיד או ניצח בתביעה נגד גיסו. כמו בה' טבת, שהניצחון הוכרז על הספרים ולא על החסידים ("דידן דהספרים נצח"), גם בסידני. העיקר שהמוסדות חזרו לסדרן, וקול התורה והחסידות ימשיך להישמע שם. (הקרדיט מגיע להרה"ח ושליח רבינו דקליפוניה ר' ברוך שלמה קונין שיחי').
זה ממש לא חשוב אם הוא הפסיד או ניצח בתביעה נגד גיסו. כמו בה' טבת, שהניצחון הוכרז על הספרים ולא על החסידים ("דידן דהספרים נצח"), גם בסידני. העיקר שהמוסדות חזרו לסדרן, וקול התורה והחסידות ימשיך להישמע שם. (הקרדיט מגיע להרה"ח ושליח רבינו דקליפוניה ר' ברוך שלמה קונין שיחי').
תגובה חדשה
הגב לתגובה
0
0
3.
בתגובה ל-1
ז' טבת ה׳תשס״ד
העיקר הוא ניצחונו של הרבי שהוא הוא ניצחונם של החסידים ונצחונו של הרבי מתבטא בכך שמוסדותיו שבו לידיו - גאולת שדה אחוזתו של רבינו.
תגובה חדשה
הגב לתגובה
0
0
4.
what didan notzach?
ז' טבת ה׳תשס״ד
what r u saying he is a ---
there is a reson no buddy likes him there its not only gutnick its the hole lubavitch of his city
there is a reson no buddy likes him there its not only gutnick its the hole lubavitch of his city
תגובה חדשה
הגב לתגובה
0
0
8.
Didan Notzach for whom?
י"א טבת ה׳תשס״ד
A number of points concerning the above article.
1. The Judge in his court decision stated that R. Feldman has been unable to distinguish between his own personal affairs and those of the institution. 2. The building that he bought back and celebrated a 'didan notzach' . In fact the building ,the shule pre existed his arrival in Sydney. It was started by holocaust survivors and was owned by the kehillah never by the Rov of the kehillah. Prior to his arrival the shule had two Rabbonim they never owned the shule. Somehow he changed the ownership to be in his and his families name. He lost the shule through his mismanagement. A shule that he never owned in the first place and it should never have been lost and now he has bought it back.The kehillah have no benefit from it as maybe one or two anash daven with him. The rest of the anash started their own shule. When he bought back the shule he had security out side if someone wanted to come into the shule to use the mikvah and they hadn't been on his side they weren't given permission to come in. Most shules have securtiy to keep terrorists out , he has security to keep jews out.3. Soemone wrote that the sound of torah has returned. They got the building back during chanukah. The anash minyan was next door, some of the so called shluchim to the yeshivah came in and threw 2 menorah's on the ground and broke them. Usually Yidden celebrate chanukah by lighting the menorah not by breaking them. Unfortunately the anash have been thrown out of the building next door . (I wonder who was instrumental in that). The anash are presently davening in private homes.They haven't and will not go to daven in the building he has purchased. 4. Someone said thanks to Rabbi Cunin. Perhaps he should ask himnself the following question. If he is interested in Kidush Lubavitch. Here you have an individual who has caused a terrible chilul Hashem and chilul Lubavitch and then Jews in the city discover that Lubavitch has come to this persons rescue, what does that say about Lubavitch in general? Perhaps before he spent all that money he should have done his homework better. may we be zoche to the true didan notzach and not what was reported on this great site COL
1. The Judge in his court decision stated that R. Feldman has been unable to distinguish between his own personal affairs and those of the institution. 2. The building that he bought back and celebrated a 'didan notzach' . In fact the building ,the shule pre existed his arrival in Sydney. It was started by holocaust survivors and was owned by the kehillah never by the Rov of the kehillah. Prior to his arrival the shule had two Rabbonim they never owned the shule. Somehow he changed the ownership to be in his and his families name. He lost the shule through his mismanagement. A shule that he never owned in the first place and it should never have been lost and now he has bought it back.The kehillah have no benefit from it as maybe one or two anash daven with him. The rest of the anash started their own shule. When he bought back the shule he had security out side if someone wanted to come into the shule to use the mikvah and they hadn't been on his side they weren't given permission to come in. Most shules have securtiy to keep terrorists out , he has security to keep jews out.3. Soemone wrote that the sound of torah has returned. They got the building back during chanukah. The anash minyan was next door, some of the so called shluchim to the yeshivah came in and threw 2 menorah's on the ground and broke them. Usually Yidden celebrate chanukah by lighting the menorah not by breaking them. Unfortunately the anash have been thrown out of the building next door . (I wonder who was instrumental in that). The anash are presently davening in private homes.They haven't and will not go to daven in the building he has purchased. 4. Someone said thanks to Rabbi Cunin. Perhaps he should ask himnself the following question. If he is interested in Kidush Lubavitch. Here you have an individual who has caused a terrible chilul Hashem and chilul Lubavitch and then Jews in the city discover that Lubavitch has come to this persons rescue, what does that say about Lubavitch in general? Perhaps before he spent all that money he should have done his homework better. may we be zoche to the true didan notzach and not what was reported on this great site COL
תגובה חדשה
הגב לתגובה
0
0
מאפשרים לכם לקבל
